They would rather brag they run their household than feel safe at night because their man acts like a man.
They would rather have a dressed up simp of a lesbian looking androgynous milquetoast than just let their man be a man.
You can immediately imaging the women reading the article defending their way of life after reading the article.....but when they have their fantasies in the dark of night....you know what I would bet you they imagine?
Some dude with his hand wrapped around her throat, slamming her down and having his way with her.
Bar none.
You can see where the rationalization begins immediately:
"
Is the trade-off of egalitarian marriage necessarily less sexual heat? It’s possible that the sexual scripts we currently follow will evolve along with our marital arrangements so that sameness becomes sexy. Regardless, more people marrying today are choosing egalitarian setups for the many other benefits they offer. If every sexual era is unhappy in its own way, it may be that we will begin to think of the challenges of egalitarian marriages less as drawbacks and more like, well, life, with its inherent limitations on how exciting any particular aspect can be.
--
Yeah, because people want dishes done more than they want raw passion.
--
“It’s the first time in history we are trying this experiment of a sexuality that’s rooted in equality and that lasts for decades,” Esther Perel said. “It’s a tall order for one person to be your partner in Management Inc., your best friend and passionate lover. There’s a certain part of you that with this partner will not be fulfilled. You deal with that loss. It’s a paradox to be lived with, not solved.”
--
Yeah, because the establishment wants me to not only sign up for a deprivation of resources and time and money and everything, but you should also not be having much sex on top of all that.
Fuck.
Fuck.
That.
Noise.
If you sign up for marriage under these constraints, you are a dumb person.
Period.
No comments:
Post a Comment